What S Wrong With This Picture Meaning
Download What S Wrong With This Picture Meaning PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get What S Wrong With This Picture Meaning book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.
Wittgensteins Remarks on Colour
The book is a first detailed discussion of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Colour, a compilation of writings on the subject from the last fifteen months of his life. The origin and significance of the remarks are explained along with a remark-by-remark guide to what Wittgenstein says. In addition to serving as an account of the thought recorded in the text, the book provides an interpretation of Wittgenstein’s treatment of colour concepts and an account of his distinctive philosophical style. Remarks on Colour is shown to be a good way into the philosophy, to reveal a great deal about how Wittgenstein approaches philosophy, and to bring out features of his thought elided, if not missed, by more general studies, especially those that focus on more finished work.
Heretical Bogomils
God. Love. Symbolism. Faith. The Cross. The 'sacrament of the present moment.' All this and more is herein.The radical, iconoclastic, sans-culotte, ultra-ist ... is back! Maximus Confessor+ takes us into a religious world that is OTHER than we were taught it should be. All in all -- a spiritually sensuous voyage.
Interpretation and Meaning in Philosophy and Religion
Interpretation and Meaning in Philosophy and Religion synthesizes cutting-edge philosophical reflections on interpretation with their application to religion. For this, new theoretical insights on interpretation by Krausz, Lamarque, Leddy, Hagberg, and Gibson are examined. Topics cover multiplism (i.e. interpretative pluralism), the goal of interpretation and its starting point. These concepts are then studied in relation to the practice of interpreting religious texts. For example, Grube proposes that the action-relevance of religious interpretations limits the possibility of tolerating divergent interpretations, Karrer-Grube challenges Lamarque’s insistence on a firm starting point, and Gokhale challenges Krausz by arguing that Vedantic practices of interpretation are non-multiplist.