Using Human Rights Law In English Courts


Download Using Human Rights Law In English Courts PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Using Human Rights Law In English Courts book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.

Download

Using Human Rights Law in English Courts


Using Human Rights Law in English Courts

Author: Murray Hunt

language: en

Publisher: Hart Publishing

Release Date: 1998-02-19


DOWNLOAD





This book demonstrates the scope that already exists for using international human rights law in English courts.

Proportionality and Deference Under the UK Human Rights Act


Proportionality and Deference Under the UK Human Rights Act

Author: Alan D. P. Brady

language: en

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Release Date: 2012-05-03


DOWNLOAD





A rigorous analysis of the relationship between proportionality and deference under the Human Rights Act.

Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act


Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act

Author: Aileen Kavanagh

language: en

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Release Date: 2009-05-07


DOWNLOAD





Under the Human Rights Act, British courts are for the first time empowered to review primary legislation for compliance with a codified set of fundamental rights. In this book, Aileen Kavanagh argues that the HRA gives judges strong powers of constitutional review, similar to those exercised by the courts under an entrenched Bill of Rights. The aim of the book is to subject the leading case-law under the HRA to critical scrutiny, whilst remaining sensitive to the deeper constitutional, political and theoretical questions which underpin it. Such questions include the idea of judicial deference, the constitutional status of the HRA, the principle of parliamentary sovereignty and the constitutional division of labour between Parliament and the courts. The book closes with a sustained defence of the legitimacy of constitutional review in a democracy, thus providing a powerful rejoinder to those who are sceptical about judicial power under the HRA.