Une Introduction A L Analyse Du Discours Argumentatif
Download Une Introduction A L Analyse Du Discours Argumentatif PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Une Introduction A L Analyse Du Discours Argumentatif book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.
Une introduction à l'analyse du discours argumentatif
Author: Vance Mendenhall
language: fr
Publisher: University of Ottawa Press
Release Date: 1990
Ce manuel de logique informelle vise à initier l'étudiant de niveau collégial et universitaire à la pratique de l'argumentation. Celle-ci est traitée ici comme un comportement spécifique. Faisant appel aux ressources de la philosophie du langage la plus récente, cet ouvrage fournit à l'étudiant de premier cycle des outils et un mode d'emploi qui lui permettront de: différencier le discours argumentatif des autres types de discours; en identifier les éléments constitutifs; l'évaluer, quel que soit le champ discursif dans lequel il se produit; enfin, produire des argumentations solides. Chaque notion majeure est illustrée par des exemples et de nombreux exercices, soigneusement gradués. À partir de coupures tirées de la presse canadienne, d'annonces publicitaires ou en compagnie de Mafalda, l'étudiant découvre les éléments du discours argumentatif, les conditions de sa réussite ou de son échec et, au-delà, le plaisir de lire et de raisonner. Ce livre est un éclairage nouveau sur le corpus traditionnel de la logique et un instrument précieux pour tous ceux -- étudiants dans diverse disciplines, mais aussi journalistes ou rédacteurs -- qui veulent communiquer efficacement. Publié en français
Translation Quality Assessment
Author: Malcolm Williams
language: en
Publisher: University of Ottawa Press
Release Date: 2004
Outlining an original, discourse-based model for translation quality assessment that goes beyond conventional microtextual error analysis, this ground-breaking new work by Malcolm Williams explores the potential of transferring reasoning and argument as the prime criterion of translation quality. Assessment through error analysis is inevitably based on an error count - an unsatisfactory means of establishing, and justifying, differences in quality that forces the evaluator to focus on subsentence elements rather than on the translator's success in conveying the key messages of the source text. Williams counters that a judgement of translation quality should be based primarily on the degree to which the translator has adequately rendered the reasoning, or argument structure. An assessment of six aspects of argument structure is proposed: argument macrostructure, propositional functions, conjunctives, types of arguments, figures of speech, and narrative strategy. Williams illustrates the approach using.
Dictionary of Argumentation
Contemporary argumentation studies continue a tradition founded by Aristotle, Cicero, Quintilian and others. Since the end of the Second World War, they have been vigorously taken over and reoriented by different schools of thought, stressing their link to the renovated disciplines of logic, dialectic, rhetoric or grammar. Anscombre, Blair, Ducrot, van Eemeren, Grize, Grootendorst, Hamblin, Johnson, Olbrechts-Tyteca, Perelman, Toulmin, Walton, Woods, and many others, have reconceptualized the field, reconnected it to contemporary scholarship and opened up rigorous and innovative avenues of research. At the turn of the century, argumentation in science education and argumentation about socio-scientific issues emerged as new fields within the larger area of argumentation studies. Within this diverse and challenging context, this comprehensive Dictionary makes a significant contribution to the construction of a common culture and shared vocabulary of argumentation. Argumentation is approached as an all-pervasive linguistic-cognitive activity, and argumentation studies are posited as a multidisciplinary field. This Dictionary of Argumentation defines 301 concepts. The 223 main entries define, comment upon, and illustrate a specific concept or a set of interrelated concepts. The 78 secondary entries refer to the relevant main entry (-ies). The relationships between the entries are marked by a system of cross-references, which strengthen the conceptual coherence of the Dictionary as a whole. This is the first dictionary of its kind to be published in English.