The Balanced Development Index For Europe U2019 S Oecd Countries 1999 U2013 2017


Download The Balanced Development Index For Europe U2019 S Oecd Countries 1999 U2013 2017 PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get The Balanced Development Index For Europe U2019 S Oecd Countries 1999 U2013 2017 book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.

Download

The Balanced Development Index for Europe{u2019}s OECD Countries, 1999{u2013}2017


The Balanced Development Index for Europe{u2019}s OECD Countries, 1999{u2013}2017

Author: Andrzej K. Koźmiński

language: en

Publisher:

Release Date: 2020


DOWNLOAD





This book presents the Balanced Development Index (BDI), measuring socioeconomic development in twenty-two European OECD member countries in a period 1999-2017. Compared to other composite measures of development, BDI looks beyond traditional development indicators, such as GDP, to create an index which gives equal weight to social, economic, objective, and subjective aspects of development. The BDI aggregates forty-two detailed indicators into four composite middle-level indexes: external economic (characterizing functioning of national economies in their international surroundings), internal economic (characterizing various aspects of domestic economic conditions), social expectations (public hopes and fears concerning economic, political and social conditions), and current social condition (including both objective and subjective social indicators)—which are, in turn, aggregated into the general BDI index.

Sustainable Development Report 2021


Sustainable Development Report 2021

Author: Jeffrey Sachs

language: en

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Release Date: 2021-10-14


DOWNLOAD





Contains insights on current issues in research on sustainable development, featuring the SDG Index and Dashboards.

PEFA, Public Financial Management, and Good Governance


PEFA, Public Financial Management, and Good Governance

Author: Jens Kromann Kristensen

language: en

Publisher: World Bank Publications

Release Date: 2019-11-24


DOWNLOAD





This project, based on the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) data set, researched how PEFA can be used to shape policy development in public financial management (PFM) and other major relevant policy areas such as anticorruption, revenue mobilization, political economy analysis, and fragile states. The report explores what shapes the PFM system in low- and middle-income countries by examining the relationship between political institutions and the quality of the PFM system. Although the report finds some evidence that multiple political parties in control of the legislature is associated with better PFM performance, the report finds the need to further refine and test the theories on the relationship between political institutions and PFM. The report addresses the question of the outcomes of PFM systems, distinguishing between fragile and nonfragile states. It finds that better PFM performance is associated with more reliable budgets in terms of expenditure composition in fragile states, but not aggregate budget credibility. Moreover, in contrast to existing studies, it finds no evidence that PFM quality matters for deficit and debt ratios, irrespective of whether a country is fragile or not. The report also explores the relationship between perceptions of corruption and PFM performance. It finds strong evidence of a relationship between better PFM performance and improvements in perceptions of corruption. It also finds that PFM reforms associated with better controls have a stronger relationship with improvements in perceptions of corruption compared to PFM reforms associated with more transparency. The last chapter looks at the relationship between PEFA indicators for revenue administration and domestic resource mobilization. It focuses on the credible use of penalties for noncompliance as a proxy for the type of political commitment required to improve tax performance. The analysis shows that countries that credibly enforce penalties for noncompliance collect more taxes on average.