Team Procedures In Image Interpretation
Download Team Procedures In Image Interpretation PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Team Procedures In Image Interpretation book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.
Team Procedures in Image Interpretation
Present study was one in a series concerned with the development of effective image interpreter team techniques and organization. Ten different team procedures were compared with each other and with individual interpreters on eight performance tests based on photography from four aerial surveillance missions of World War II and four missions flown during the Korean war. Degree of cooperation and working methods were systematically varied in 80 matched teams of two or three Army image interpreters. Rights and wrongs scores were based on a consensus of either two or three team members. Three-man teams, with individuals working independently, proved consistently superior to the average individual interpreter attaining the same level of completness as the average individual with substantial increases in accuracy. On the eight-mission performance tests used in this experiment, the three-man independent teams had average accuracy scores ranging from 52% to 100% versus 12% to 39% for the average individual. Two-man independent teams also showed gains in accuracy but with reduced completeness compared with individual performance. (Author).
Maintaining Image Interpreter Proficiency Through Team Consensus Feedback
Under ongoing research objectives of the COMPONENT INTEGRATION Task, the present exploratory study was conducted to determine if the use of team consensus feedback leads to improvement of individual interpreter performance. Fifty-four relatively inexperienced enlisted interpreters (recent USAIS graduates) were subjects in the experiment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment tests were given to evaluate individual performance, and a practice phase was provided in which various types of feedback were introduced. Six experimental proficiency maintenance methods were used--three were based on consensus feedback and two on precise feedback (identifications made by experts); and one (control) simulated normal everyday operations with no feedback. Performance was evaluated in terms of amount of gain in target detection and identification scores. Results were in the expected direction; namely, there was greater overall improvement in performance of individuals working in teams with consensus feedback than in performance of individuals working alone with no feedback. Average gain in proficiency was greater under consensus feedback methods in which interpreters checked teammates' reports after each of three stereo pairs than after interpretation of all three stereo pairs. The precise feedback methods, which require ground truth as basis for feedback, resulted in the greatest average gain in interpreter proficiency. Differences among the experimental methods were attributable to improvement in target identification rather than to improvement in target detection. (Author).
The Use of Teams in Image Interpretation
Requirement: To determine methods of team operation which may result in a decrease in time required for team interpretation while maintaining the superiority of teams in accuracy and completeness -- specifically to determine amount and kind of information to be passed from one teammate to another, to determine whether one teammate could accurately determine when he needed a teammate’s assistance, and to determine how disagreements among teammates could be resolved expeditiously.