Taking Sides Clashing Views On Moral Issues Expanded


Download Taking Sides Clashing Views On Moral Issues Expanded PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Taking Sides Clashing Views On Moral Issues Expanded book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.

Download

Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Moral Issues, Expanded


Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Moral Issues, Expanded

Author: Stephen Satris

language: en

Publisher: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin

Release Date: 2012-05-14


DOWNLOAD





Taking Sides volumes present current controversial issues in a debate-style format designed to stimulate student interest and develop critical thinking skills. Each issue is thoughtfully framed with Learning Outcomes, an Issue Summary, an Introduction, and an Exploring the Issue section featuring Critical Thinking and Reflection, Is There Common Ground?, and Additional Resources. Taking Sides readers also offer a Topic Guide and an annotated listing of Internet References for further consideration of the issues. An online Instructor’s Resource Guide with testing material is available for each volume. Using Taking Sides in the Classroom is also an excellent instructor resource. Visit www.mhhe.com/takingsides for more details.

Taking Sides : Clashing Views on Moral Issues


Taking Sides : Clashing Views on Moral Issues

Author: Stephen Satris

language: en

Publisher:

Release Date: 2008


DOWNLOAD





Taking Sides


Taking Sides

Author: Stephen Satris

language: en

Publisher: Dushkin/McGraw-Hill

Release Date: 1994


DOWNLOAD





Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Moral Issues, Tenth Edition, is a debate-style reader designed to introduce students to controversies in moral philosophy. The readings, which represent the arguments of leading philosophers and commentators, reflect a variety of viewpoints and have been selected for their liveliness and substance and because of their value in a debate framework.