Space In Language And Cognition


Download Space In Language And Cognition PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Space In Language And Cognition book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.

Download

Space in Language and Cognition


Space in Language and Cognition

Author: Stephen C. Levinson

language: en

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Release Date: 2003-03-20


DOWNLOAD





Languages differ in how they describe space, and such differences between languages can be used to explore the relation between language and thought. This 2003 book shows that even in a core cognitive domain like spatial thinking, language influences how people think, memorize and reason about spatial relations and directions. After outlining a typology of spatial coordinate systems in language and cognition, it is shown that not all languages use all types, and that non-linguistic cognition mirrors the systems available in the local language. The book reports on collaborative, interdisciplinary research, involving anthropologists, linguists and psychologists, conducted in many languages and cultures around the world, which establishes this robust correlation. The overall results suggest that thinking in the cognitive sciences underestimates the transformative power of language on thinking. The book will be of interest to linguists, psychologists, anthropologists and philosophers, and especially to students of spatial cognition.

Space in Language and Cognition


Space in Language and Cognition

Author: Stephen C. Levinson

language: en

Publisher:

Release Date: 2003-03-20


DOWNLOAD





The book will appeal to all researchers interested in the relation of language to other areas of cognition - linguists, psychologists, anthropologists, philosophers - and especially to students of spacial cognition."--BOOK JACKET.

Space in Language and Cognition


Space in Language and Cognition

Author: Annika Wildersch

language: en

Publisher: GRIN Verlag

Release Date: 2015-12-07


DOWNLOAD





Seminar paper from the year 2015 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Other, grade: 2,0, Humboldt-University of Berlin (Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik), course: Sprachwissenschaftliche Methoden und Englischunterricht, language: English, abstract: This term paper deals with the debate between two opposing viewpoints about the causation between language and cognition in the spatial domain. The first perspective is called linguistic relativity, which holds that the structure of a language influences the cognitive processes of the speakers and affects the ways in which they conceive the world. In other words, the principle of linguistic relativity claims that language shapes the way we think. This standpoint will be represented by articles from research groups around the linguists Eric Pederson and Stephen Levinson (Pederson et al., 1998; Levinson et al., 2002). The opposing stance contains the universalist notion that all languages are broadly similar and linguistic systems are merely the formal and expressive medium that speakers use to describe their mental representations. Hence, linguistic coding cannot have effects on cognition but reflects antecedently existing conceptual distinctions. This attitude is conveyed by the psychologists Peggy Li and Lila Gleitman (Li & Gleitman, 2002), who argue that “it’s the thought that counts” (ibid, 291). The paper is structured in the following way. To explain the basis of the debate, the main part opens with an introduction of the different frames of reference that are employed in distinct languages to convey spatial information. Next, Pederson’s experiments and interpretations about the effect of spatial coding in language on cognition are presented. Then, a reinterpretation of these findings and further experiments by Li and Gleitman are outlined. Finally, a critical comment by Levinson on Li and Gleitman’s analysis will show how he defends the position of linguistic relativity in the domain of spatial coding. In the concluding chapter of this paper, a summary of the debate will be provided, accompanied by a discussion about the transferability on the general relation between language and cognition.