Rule And Foundational Documents
Download Rule And Foundational Documents PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Rule And Foundational Documents book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.
Rule and Foundational Documents
Author: Saint Jean Baptiste de La Salle
language: en
Publisher: Lasallian Publications
Release Date: 2002
Includes the Rule of 1705, the Rule of 1718, Memorandum on the Habit, Rules I Have Imposed on Myself, and Other Personal Documents by John Baptist de La Salle
Byzantine Monastic Foundation Documents
The nature of the typkia, discussed by John Thomas in the introduction, was one of flexible and personal documents, which differed considerably in form, length, and content. Not all of them were foundation documents in the strict sense, since they could be issued at any time in the history of an institution. Some were wills; others were reform decrees and rules; yet others were primarily liturgical in character.
Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights
This book, which originated from the broadly held view that there is a lack of Rule-of-law in Mexico, and from the emphasis of traditional academia on cultural elements as the main explanation, explores the question of whether there is any relationship between the system of constitutional review ― and thus the ‘law’ as such ― and the level of Rule-of-law in a given state. To do so, it elaborates a theoretical model for achieving Rule-of-law and compares it to the constitutional review systems of the United States, the Federal Republic of Germany, and Mexico. The study concludes that the two former states correspond to the model, while the latter does not. This is fundamentally due to the role each legal system assigns to ordinary jurisdiction in carrying out constitutional review. Whereas the US and Germany have fostered the policy that constitutional review regarding the enforcement of basic rights is the responsibility of ordinary courts, Mexico has relied too heavily on the specialized constitutional jurisdiction.