Qu Es La Responsabilidad Judicial A Qui N Afecta Estudio Comparado De Los Sistemas De Espa A Y Colombia

¿Qué es la responsabilidad judicial? ¿A quién afecta?.Estudio comparado de los sistemas de España y Colombia

La responsabilidad judicial es un tema que adquiere cada vez más importancia en todos los países. Esta responsabilidad cuenta con dos vertientes fundamentales: la responsabilidad personal del juez ya sea civil, penal o disciplinaria y la responsabilidad del Estado por error o anormal funcionamiento de la Administración de Justicia. Con la presente obra los autores aportan un estudio descriptivo de ambos ordenamientos jurídicos de España y Colombia y una panorámica general comparativa, para obtener sus propias conclusiones y poder realizar su aportación constructiva y su valoración destacando posibles consideraciones de mejora en ambos ordenamientos jurídicos, fruto de su análisis comparado. Esperamos que el lector disfrute de su lectura y se enriquezca de sus contenidos.

¿Qué es la resposansabilidad judicial? ¿A quién afecta?

A Theory of Constitutional Rights

In any country where there is a Bill of Rights, constitutional rights reasoning is an important part of the legal process. As more and more countries adopt Human Rights legislation and accede to international human rights agreements, and as the European Union introduces its own Bill of Rights, judges struggle to implement these rights consistently and sometimes the reasoning behind them is lost. Examining the practice in other jurisdictions can be a valuable guide. Robert Alexy's classic work reconstructs the reasoning behind the jurisprudence of the German Basic Law and in doing so provides a theory of general application to all jurisdictions where judges wrestle with rights adjudication. In considering the features of constitutional rights reasoning, the author moves from the doctrine of proportionality, procedural rights and the structure and scope of constitutional rights, to general rights of liberty and equality and the problem of horizontal effect. A postscript written for the English edition considers critiques of the Theory since it first appeared in 1985, focusing in particular on the discretion left to legislatures and in an extended introduction the translator argues that the theory may be used to clarify the nature of legal reasoning in the context of rights under the British Constitution.