Progress Measures And Finite Arguments For Infinite Computations
Download Progress Measures And Finite Arguments For Infinite Computations PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Progress Measures And Finite Arguments For Infinite Computations book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.
Progress Measures and Finite Arguments for Infinite Computations
Most previous research relies on transformations of programs in order to reduce a verification problem to problems that can be solved using classical techniques such a refinement mappings and well-founded orderings. Progress measures, the key innovation of this thesis, provide direct, syntax-independent verification techniques for a wide range of specifications.
CONCUR '94: Concurrency Theory
This volume constitutes the proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR '94, held at Uppsala, Sweden in August 1994. In total, 29 refereed research papers selected from 108 submissions for the conference are presented together with full papers or abstracts of the 5 invited talks by prominent speakers. The book contains recent results on all relevant aspects of concurrency research and thus competently documents the progress of the field since the predecessor conference CONCUR '93, the proceedings of which are published as LNCS 715.
Logic from Computer Science
Author: Yiannis N. Moschovakis
language: en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date: 1992
The volume is the outgrowth of a workshop with the same title held at MSRI in the week of November 13-17, 1989, and for those who did not get it, Logic from Computer Science is the converse of Logic in Computer Science, the full name of the highly successful annual LICS conferences. We meant to have a conference which would bring together the LICS commu nity with some of the more traditional "mathematical logicians" and where the emphasis would be on the flow of ideas from computer science to logic rather than the other way around. In a LICS talk, sometimes, the speaker presents a perfectly good theorem about (say) the A-calculus or finite model theory in terms of its potential applications rather than its (often more ob vious) intrinsic, foundational interest and intricate proof. This is not meant to be a criticism; the LICS meetings are, after all, organized by the IEEE Computer Society. We thought, for once, it would be fun to see what we would get if we asked the speakers to emphasize the relevance of their work for logic rather than computer science and to point out what is involved in the proofs. I think, mostly, it worked. In any case, the group of people represented as broad a selection of logicians as I have seen in recent years, and the quality of the talks was (in my view) exceptionally, unusually high. I learned a lot and (I think) others did too.