Observation And Numerical Modeling Of Seismic Wave Propagation In Both Isotropic And Anisotropic Media


Download Observation And Numerical Modeling Of Seismic Wave Propagation In Both Isotropic And Anisotropic Media PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Observation And Numerical Modeling Of Seismic Wave Propagation In Both Isotropic And Anisotropic Media book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.

Download

Numerical Modeling of Seismic Wave Propagation


Numerical Modeling of Seismic Wave Propagation

Author: Johan O. A. Robertsson

language: en

Publisher: SEG Books

Release Date: 2012


DOWNLOAD





The decades following SEG's 1990 volume on numerical modeling showed a step change in the application and use of full wave equation modeling methods enabled by the increase in computational power. Full waveform inversion, reverse time migration, and 3D elastic finite-difference synthetic data generation are examples. A searchable CD is included.

Seismic Anisotropy in the Earth


Seismic Anisotropy in the Earth

Author: V. Babuska

language: en

Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media

Release Date: 1991-07-31


DOWNLOAD





Structural geologists are well aware of the fact that isotropic rocks are quite exceptional in nature. Whicheverorigin, sedimentary, metamorphicormagmatic, rocks are shaped with a plane of mineral flattening, the foliation in geologists' jargon, and with a line ofmineral elongation, the lineation. Just like a good quarryman, a trained structural geologistwill detectapreferredorientationin an apparently isotropic granite. Preferred mineral orientation and thus structural anisotropy are the rule in nature. Consideringthe largevariationsinelasticcoefficientsofrock-forming minerals, itcould be predicted that, in turn, seismic anisotropy should exist and be important, provided thatdomains withasimilarstructural signatureare largeenough to affectseismic waves. This is why, in 1982 at a conference held in Frankfurt, which was oneofthe fIrst meetings devoted to the subject of seismic anisotropy, I asked Don Anderson the question of why seismologists had not considered earlier in their models the obvious constraint of anisotropy. I still remember Don's answer: "Adolphe, we knew that our isotropic models were not very good but we had no other choice. It is simply that, so far, computerswere not largeenough tointegrate the anisotropy parameter". Changingisotropic glassesfor anisotropic ones permits us to obtain betterand more realistic seismic modelsofthe Earth's interior, but, maybe more importantly, it has, for a seismologist, the farreaching consequenceofsteppinginto the fIeld ofgeodynamics.