Model Selection For Irt Equating Of Testlet Based Tests In The Random Groups Design
Download Model Selection For Irt Equating Of Testlet Based Tests In The Random Groups Design PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Model Selection For Irt Equating Of Testlet Based Tests In The Random Groups Design book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.
Model Selection for IRT Equating of Testlet-based Tests in the Random Groups Design
The traditional equipercentile equating method was used as the baseline for comparison in both real data and simulated data analyses. It was found in the study that both testlet length and the LID level affected the performance of the investigated models on IRT true and observed score equating of testlet-based tests. When the traditional 3PL IRT model was used for tests with long testlets, higher levels of local item dependence led to IRT equating results that deviated further away from those obtained from the baseline method. However, the effect of local item dependence on IRT equating results was not prominent for tests with short testlets. Moreover, for tests consisting of long testlets (e.g., a testlet length of 10 or more) and having a very low level of local item dependence (e.g., a LID level of 0.25 or lower), and for tests consisting of short testlets (e.g., a testlet length around 5), all four investigated IRT models worked well in IRT true and observed score equating. For tests with long testlets and a relatively high level of local item dependence (e.g., a LID level of 0.5625 or higher), the GRM, bifactor, and TRT models outperformed the traditional 3PL IRT model in IRT true and observed equating of testlet-based tests. The study suggested that the selection of models for IRT true and observed score equating of testlet-based tests should be considered with respect to the features of the testlet-based tests and the groups of examinees from which the data is collected. It is hoped that this study encourages researchers to identify differences among existing models for IRT true and observed score equating of testlet-based tests with various features, and to develop new models that are appropriate for modeling testlet-based tests to obtain accurate IRT number correct score equating results.
Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking
Author: Michael J. Kolen
language: en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date: 2013-03-14
Test equating methods are used with many standardized tests in education and psychology to ensure that scores from multiple test forms can be used interchangeably. In recent years, researchers from the education, psychology, and statistics communities have contributed to the rapidly growing statistical and psychometric methodologies used in test equating. This book provides an introduction to test equating which both discusses the most frequently used equating methodologies and covers many of the practical issues involved. This second edition expands upon the coverage of the first edition by providing a new chapter on test scaling and a second on test linking. Test scaling is the process of developing score scales that are used when scores on standardized tests are reported. In test linking, scores from two or more tests are related to one another. Linking has received much recent attention, due largely to investigations of linking similarly named tests from different test publishers or tests constructed for different purposes. The expanded coverage in the second edition also includes methodology for using polytomous item response theory in equating. The themes of the second edition include: * the purposes of equating, scaling and linking and their practical context * data collection designs * statistical methodology * designing reasonable and useful equating, scaling, and linking studies * importance of test development and quality control processes to equating * equating error, and the underlying statistical assumptions for equating "Given the perennial debates about academic standards and grade inflation, it is my view that tools such as those described in this book should be adopted much more widely by the academic community than they are at present. This book provides an excellent overview, and I strongly recommend it." Short Book Reviews of the ISI, April2005 "I highly recommend this book to everybody who has any interest in equating and linking, be they a student, practitioner, or researcher." Psychometrika, 2006
Test Equating
Author: Michael J. Kolen
language: en
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Release Date: 2013-11-11
In recent years, many researchers in the psychology and statistical communities have paid increasing attention to test equating as issues of using multiple test forms have arisen and in response to criticisms of traditional testing techniques. This book provides a practically oriented introduction to test equating which both discusses the most frequently used equating methodologies and covers many of the practical issues involved. The main themes are: - the purpose of equating - distinguishing between equating and related methodologies - the importance of test equating to test development and quality control - the differences between equating properties, equating designs, and equating methods - equating error, and the underlying statistical assumptions for equating. The authors are acknowledged experts in the field, and the book is based on numerous courses and seminars they have presented. As a result, educators, psychometricians, professionals in measurement, statisticians, and students coming to the subject for the first time as part of their graduate study will find this an invaluable text and reference.