Fabrizio Piraino
Download Fabrizio Piraino PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Fabrizio Piraino book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.
Abuse of Fundamental Rights
Author: Fabio Carvalho de Alvarenga Peixoto
language: en
Publisher: Fabio Carvalho de Alvarenga Peixoto
Release Date: 2023-11-20
The book is an adaptation of part of the author's PhD thesis, which won the international prize Prémio FIBE, and was voted one of the three best in Brazil, in the field of Law, in 2023. It addresses the appropriation of the private law notion of abuse of rights by the theory of fundamental rights. It also presents guidelines for an appropriate use of the discourse of abuse of fundamental rights (highly dependent on a Dogmatics of scope, approached according to a model of groups of cases). Fabio Carvalho de Alvarenga Peixoto PhD in Constitutional Law (Universidade de Fortaleza - Brazil). State Attorney. Private lawyer. Winner of the international prize Prémio FIBE, and of an honorable mention in the Capes (Brazilian Ministry of Education) PhD Thesis Award 2023. INTRODUCTION 1 THE GENERAL NOTION OF ABUSE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 1.1 Admission by Literature of the Abuse of Fundamental Rights 1.1.1 Unconscious phase 1.1.2 Constructive Phase of Incipient Dogmatization 1.1.3 Constructive Phase of Peripheral Systematization 1.2 Delimitation of the Abuse of Fundamental Rights in the Face of the Verwirkung of Fundamental Rights 1.3 Presuppositions of the Notion of Abuse of Fundamental Rights 1.3.1 Fundamental Right Permission Granted by ‘Abstract’ Interpretation of the Constitutional (or with Constitutional Status) Text or of a Judicial Decision Interpreting the Constitution 1.3.2 Prohibition ‘Discovered’ by Judge, Outside the Limits of ‘Abstract’ Interpretation of the Normative Text 2 FROM PRIVATE LAW DOCTRINES OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS TO A THEORY OF ABUSE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 2.1 The Effectiveness of Fundamental Rights Between Private Individuals (Drittwirkung) as a Bridge Between Private Law Doctrines of Abuse of Rights and the Theory of Fundamental Rights 2.2 Problems of Using the Approaches of the Private Law Doctrines of Abuse of Rights in the Theory of Fundamental Rights 2.2.1 The Problem of the Controllability of State Interventions in Fundamental Rights 2.2.1.1 Creation of Law Outside the Limits of the Normative Text 2.2.1.2 Lack of Control Parameters of the Definitory Approaches 2.2.2 The Problem of the Risk of Eliminating the Individual Function of the Fundamental Right 2.2.3 The Problem of the Confusion with the Dogmatics of the Limits of Fundamental Rights 2.2.3.1 Dogmatic Autonomy of Abuse of Fundamental Rights vis-à-vis the Doctrines of Limits of Fundamental Rights 2.2.3.2 The Relation Between Abuse of Fundamental Rights and Dogmatic Conceptions of the Broadness of the Tatbestände of Fundamental Rights 3 CONTROL OF THE RATIONALITY OF THE DISCOURSE OF ABUSE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AS A JUSTIFICATORY “SHORTCUT” 3.1 Needless for a Constitutional General Clause to Restrain Abuse of Fundamental Rights 3.2 The Need for a Singular Dogmatics 3.3 Identification of the Abuse of Fundamental Rights as a Task of Peripheral Systematization Grounded on Concrete Evaluations 4 UNACCEPTABLE APPROACHES TO THE ABUSE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 4.1 Abuse of Fundamental Rights Without Parameters 4.2 Abuse of Fundamental Rights as Inadmissible Form of Exercise 4.3 Abuse of Fundamental Rights as Synonym for Exceeding a Limit 4.4 Abuse of Fundamental Rights as Typical Unlawfulness 4.5 Abuse of Fundamental Rights as Fraud Against the Law 4.6 Abuse of Fundamental Rights as Unreasonableness 4.7 Abuse of Fundamental Rights as Result of Alexyan Balancing 4.8 Abuse of Fundamental Rights as Disproportionality (Abuse of Fundamental Rights as Result of Means-End Balancing) 5 ACCEPTABLE APPROACHES TO THE ABUSE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 5.1 Inadmissible Harmful Intent 5.2 Dogmatization of the Normative Scope 5.2.1 Direct Dogmatization 5.2.2 Indirect Dogmatization 5.3 Violation of Objective Good Faith 5.4 Violation of Good Customs 6 GROUPS OF ABUSE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS CASES AS LIMITS OF THE LIMITS CONCLUSION
Abuse of Rights
Author: Fabio Carvalho de Alvarenga Peixoto
language: en
Publisher: Fabio Carvalho de Alvarenga Peixoto
Release Date: 2023-11-16
The book is an adaptation of part of the author's PhD thesis, which won the international prize Prémio FIBE, and was voted one of the three best in Brazil, in the field of Law, in 2023. It deals with the history of the notion of abuse of rights, in its two traditions: the Franco-Belgian (abus de droit) and the German (unzulässige Rechtsausübung). It also presents the discourse of abuse of rights with a 'shortcut' function. Finally, it places the scientific formulation of groups of cases as necessary for the proper use of the abuse of rights discourse. Fabio Carvalho de Alvarenga Peixoto PhD in Constitutional Law (Universidade de Fortaleza - Brazil). State Attorney. Private lawyer. Winner of the international prize Prémio FIBE, and of an honorable mention in the Capes (Brazilian Ministry of Education) PhD Thesis Award 2023. INTRODUCTION 1 THE BEGINNING OF THE HISTORIES OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS 2 THE GENERAL CONCEPT OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS 2.1 Literature Admission of Abuse of Rights as an Atypical Unlawfulness 2.1.1 Unconscious Phase 2.1.2 Constructive Phase of Incipient Dogmatization 2.1.3 Constructive Phase of Peripheral Systematization 2.2 Delimitation of Abuse of Rights in the Face of Abuse (Misuse) of Power 2.3 Presuppositions of the Notion of Abuse of Rights 2.3.1 Permission Granted by ‘Abstract’ Interpretation of a Normative Text 2.3.2 Prohibition ‘Discovered’ by Judge, Outside the Limits of ‘Abstract’ Interpretation of Normative Text 3 THE FUNCTION OF THE NOTION OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS 3.1 Abuse of Rights as a “Gathering Concept” 3.2 Practical Indispensability of the Dogmatic Formulation of (Open) Groups of Cases for the Rational Application of the Prohibition of Abuse of Rights 3.3 Abuse of Rights as a “Shortcut” (which “can Slow You Down”) 4 THE TWO TRADITIONS OF PRIVATE LAW DOCTRINES OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS 4.1 The French-Belgian Tradition of Abus de Droit 4.1.1 Harmful Intent Approach 4.1.1.1 The Beginnings of the Abus de Droit Tradition 4.1.1.2 Unnecessary Dammage Approach 4.1.2 Deviation from the Economic and Social Purposes of Rights Approach 4.1.2.1 Louis Josserand’s Original Approach 4.1.2.2 Violation of Dominant Morality Approach 4.1.2.3 Reception in Germany by Wolfgang Siebert of the Deviation of Purpose Approach (Rechtsmißbrauch) and its Evolution into the Doctrine of Institutional Abuse (Institutioneller Rechtsmißbrauch) 4.1.2.4 Denial of the Axiological Fundament (‘Formal Axiologism’) Approach: Non-Replacing Overcoming 4.1.3 Disproportion between Advantages and Losses Approach 4.2 The German Tradition of Unzulässige Rechtsausübung 4.2.1 Prohibition of Chicanery Approach 4.2.2 Violation of Objective Good Faith Approach 4.2.3 Violation of Good Customs Approach 4.3 Excerpt: Germanophile Definitory Approach of Abuse of Rights as Violation of Principle 5 THE METHODICAL ISSUES NOT RESOLVED BY DOCTRINES OF ABUSE OF RIGHTS 5.1 The Importance of the Recognition of the Meta-Individual Function of Rights 5.2 Meta-Individual Function and Individual Function: Methodical Requirement of Sizing Criteria for Each Right 5.3 Limited Scope of the Objective Good Faith Approach 6 THE NEED FOR RATIONAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE IDENTIFICATION OF ABUSE OF RIGHT AS A MECHANISM FOR CONTROLLING JUDICIAL DISCRETION 6.1 Insufficiency of the Standard Theories of Legal Argumentation for Rational Justification of the Evaluation of Abuse of Rights 6.2 The Use of Dogmatically Formulated Groups of Cases for the Rational Justification of the evaluation of Abuse of Rights CONCLUSION REFERENCES