Determinants Of An Audit Report Lag A Meta Analysis
Download Determinants Of An Audit Report Lag A Meta Analysis PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Determinants Of An Audit Report Lag A Meta Analysis book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.
Determinants of an Audit Report Lag. A Meta-analysis
Seminar paper from the year 2020 in the subject Business economics - Information Management, grade: 2,0, University of Bremen, language: English, abstract: This paper shows with the help of a meta-analysis the existence of the determinants of an audit report lag. Moreover this article calculates the relevance of these determinants with the help of Z-scores. The justification of this paper is to get a greater extent of knowledge through a meta-analytic literature review of the determinants of audit report lags. An audit report lag is the number of days from a company's fiscal year-end to the date of its auditor's report. Due to the great development of the globalization and economy, this world has more economical data and is more complicated in an economical context than before. Proof for this statement is the subprime crisis 2007, where Asset-Backed Commercial Papers had a complicated transformation. In addition to this the accounting has issues with too much information and complicated financial products. At first accounting has problems with disclosure of information in the financial statement. Secondly Big Data challenges accounting and finally audit report lags are larger after a new standard is set by the standard-setter or a company has a poor performance in this particular fiscal year. In addition to this last problem, there are a lot of more determinants for an audit report lag than these two. Accordingly this audit report lag is a problem for accounting.
Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management
This is the Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (ICMSEM) held from July 21-23, 2015 at Karlsruhe, Germany. The goals of the conference are to foster international research collaborations in Management Science and Engineering Management as well as to provide a forum to present current findings. These proceedings cover various areas in management science and engineering management. It focuses on the identification of management science problems in engineering and innovatively using management theory and methods to solve engineering problems effectively. It also establishes a new management theory and methods based on experience of new management issues in engineering. Readers interested in the fields of management science and engineering management will benefit from the latest cutting-edge innovations and research advances presented in these proceedings and will find new ideas and research directions. A total number of 132 papers from 15 countries are selected for the proceedings by the conference scientific committee through rigorous referee review. The selected papers in the first volume are focused on Intelligent System and Management Science covering areas of Intelligent Systems, Logistics Engineering, Information Technology and Risk Management. The selected papers in the second volume are focused on Computing and Engineering Management covering areas of Computing Methodology, Project Management, Industrial Engineering and Decision Making Systems.
Auditor Going Concern Reporting
Auditor reporting on going-concern-related uncertainties remains one of the most challenging issues faced by external auditors. Business owners, market participants and audit regulators want an early warning of impending business failure. However, companies typically do not welcome audit opinions indicating uncertainty regarding their future viability. Thus, the auditor’s decision to issue a "going concern opinion" (GCO) is a complex and multi-layered one, facing a great deal of tension. Given such a rich context, academic researchers have examined many facets related to an auditor’s decision to issue a GCO. This monograph reviews and synthesizes 182 recent GCO studies that have appeared since the last significant review published in 2013 through the end of 2019. The authors categorize studies into the three broad areas of GCO: (1) determinants, (2) accuracy and (3) consequences. As an integral part of their synthesis, they summarize the details of each study in several user-friendly tables. After discussing and synthesizing the research, they present a discussion of opportunities for future research, including issues created or exacerbated as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic. This monograph will be of assistance to researchers interested in exploring this area of auditor responsibility. It will also be of interest to auditing firms and individual practitioners wanting to learn what academic research has examined and found regarding this challenging aspect of audit practice. Auditing standard-setters and regulators will find it of interest as the authors review numerous studies examining issues related to audit policy and regulation, and their effects on GCO decisions. The examination of GCO research is extremely timely given the financial and business disruption caused by the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. This unprecedented global event has caused companies, auditors and professional bodies to revisit and reassess their approach to going concern, and to think even more deeply about this fundamental business imperative.