Demystifying Decision Making


Download Demystifying Decision Making PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Demystifying Decision Making book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.

Download

Demystifying Decision-Making


Demystifying Decision-Making

Author: Aimee Joseph

language: en

Publisher: Gospel Coalition

Release Date: 2022


DOWNLOAD





"Addresses common wrong approaches to making decisions, replacing them with biblically informed, practical tools for the decisions-making process"--

Demystifying Evaluation


Demystifying Evaluation

Author: Parsons, David

language: en

Publisher: Policy Press

Release Date: 2017-02-22


DOWNLOAD





Social research practitioners and others working in the public and voluntary sectors, in academia and consultancy are increasingly under pressure to provide policy-related evidence with limited resources and rising expectations. Demystifying evaluation is an accessible introductory guide setting the foundations for tackling those challenges, explaining the options open to evaluators, their merits and uses, and how to make appropriate choices of research methods. Drawing on his experience of policy and programme evaluations for the public sector and outside, David Parsons provides a practical roadmap cutting across different evaluation theories. He covers issues such as managing expectations of evaluation, using and mixing quantitative and qualitative methods, engaging stakeholders and providing action-orientated approaches to help end-users.

Demystifying Legal Reasoning


Demystifying Legal Reasoning

Author: Larry Alexander

language: en

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Release Date: 2008-06-16


DOWNLOAD





Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false.