Avignon Et Partout Ailleurs Premiere Partie Roman Voyage Sur L Amour Et Le Salut Du Monde Base Sur Des Faits Reels Ce Texte Est Publie A La Memoire De Son Auteur


Download Avignon Et Partout Ailleurs Premiere Partie Roman Voyage Sur L Amour Et Le Salut Du Monde Base Sur Des Faits Reels Ce Texte Est Publie A La Memoire De Son Auteur PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. Click Download or Read Online button to get Avignon Et Partout Ailleurs Premiere Partie Roman Voyage Sur L Amour Et Le Salut Du Monde Base Sur Des Faits Reels Ce Texte Est Publie A La Memoire De Son Auteur book now. This website allows unlimited access to, at the time of writing, more than 1.5 million titles, including hundreds of thousands of titles in various foreign languages.

Download

Avignon et partout ailleurs. Première partie. Roman-voyage sur l’amour et le salut du monde. Basé sur des faits réels, ce texte est publié à la mémoire de son auteur.


Avignon et partout ailleurs. Première partie. Roman-voyage sur l’amour et le salut du monde. Basé sur des faits réels, ce texte est publié à la mémoire de son auteur.

Author: Mara Ming

language: en

Publisher: Litres

Release Date: 2019-08-21


DOWNLOAD





C’est un roman-voyage, roman-journal qui s’étend d’Avignon en France jusqu’au fins fond de la Sybérie: il raconte un grand amour. Il parle d’une rencontre entre un artiste qui, ayant commencé sa vie dans un orphélinat, est passé par le grand banditisme et a finit par arriver dans le show-business, et une écrivaine qui n’a pas voulu passer à côté de son histoire et, du coup, à fini par écrire la sienne.Et, surtout, c’est un roman qui parle de la foi. L’histoire est réelle.

French Literary Fascism


French Literary Fascism

Author: David Carroll

language: en

Publisher: Princeton University Press

Release Date: 2021-01-12


DOWNLOAD





This is the first book to provide a sustained critical analysis of the literary-aesthetic dimension of French fascism--the peculiarly French form of what Walter Benjamin called the fascist "aestheticizing of politics." Focusing first on three important extremist nationalist writers at the turn of the century and then on five of the most visible fascist intellectuals in France in the 1930s, David Carroll shows how both traditional and modern concepts of art figure in the elaboration of fascist ideology--and in the presentation of fascism as an art of the political. Carroll is concerned with the internal relations of fascism and literature--how literary fascists conceived of politics as a technique for fashioning a unified people and transforming the disparate elements of society into an organic, totalized work of art. He explores the logic of such aestheticizing, as well as the assumptions about art, literature, and culture at the basis of both the aesthetics and politics of French literary fascists. His book reveals how not only classical humanism but also modern aesthetics that defend the autonomy and integrity of literature became models for xenophobic forms of nationalism and extreme "cultural" forms of anti-Semitism. A cogent analysis of the ideological function of literature and culture in fascism, this work helps us see the ramifications of thinking of literature or art as the truth or essence of politics.

You Shall Know Them


You Shall Know Them

Author: Vercors

language: en

Publisher: Stacey International

Release Date: 2009


DOWNLOAD





CLASSIC FICTION. The Paranthropus ("tropi" for short) are a large tribe of New Guinea cliff-dwellers. Simian in many of their physical characteristics, they are normally erect in stance, though happy to drop to all fours at a moment's notice. Australian wool interests see the tropis as a dream come true--workers who can be trained without benefit of paycheck. Newspaperman Douglas Templemore is an idealist--by killing his son (bred by artificial insemination of a female tropi), he hopes to cause a riot in the realm of race relations. Is he a murderer or merely an owner of a pet, which he has "put to sleep?" As he comes up for trial scientific experts file into the witness box; none agreeing on what constitutes a human being. Is man to be defined by his jawbone? By his rational capacity? By his grasp of metaphysics? Or is the judge right when he muses (without a trace of cynicism) that the tropis must be animals because they are not cannibals?