Apologie Pour Les Saincts Peres De L Eglise Defenseurs De La Grace De Iesus Christ Contre Les Erreurs Qui Leur Sont Imposees Dans La Traduction Du Traitte De La Vocation Des Gentils Attribue A Saint Prosper Dans Le Reflexions Du Traducteur

Apologie pour les saincts peres de l'Eglise, defenseurs de la Grace de Iesus-Christ. Contre les erreurs qui leur sont imposées. Dans la traduction du Traitté de la Vocation des Gentils, attribué à saint Prosper, & dans le reflexions du traducteur. ..

Apologie pour les saincts peres de l'Eglise, defenseurs de la grace de Jesus-Christ. Contre les erreurs qui leur sont imposées. Dans la traduction du Traicté de la vocation des gentils, attribué à S. Prosper, et dans les reflexions du traducteur. Dans le livre de Mr Morel, docteur de Sorbonne, intitulé les Veritables sentimens de S. Augustin et de l'Eglise et dans les escrits de Mr Le Moine docteur de Sorbonne, et professeur en theologie, dictez en 1647 et 1650

Jansenism and England

Jansenism and England: Moral Rigorism across the Confessions examines the impact in mid- to later-seventeenth-century England of the major contemporary religious controversy in France, which revolved around the formal condemnation of a heresy popularly called Jansenism. The associated debates involved fundamental questions about the doctrine of grace and moral theology, about the life of the Church and the conduct of individual Christians. Thomas Palmer analyses the main themes of the controversy and an account of instances of English interest, arguing that English Protestant theologians who were in the process of working out their own views on basic theological questions recognised the relevance of the continental debates. The arguments evolved by the French writers also constitute a point of comparison for the developing views of English theologians. Where the Jansenists reasserted an Augustinian emphasis on the gratuity of salvation against Catholic theologians who over-valued the powers of human nature, the English writers examined here, arguing against Protestant theologians who denied nature any moral potency, emphasised man's contribution to his own salvation. Both arguments have been seen to contain a corrosive individualism, the former through its preoccupation with the luminous experience of grace, the latter through its tendency to elide grace and moral virtue. These assessments are challenged here. Nevertheless, these theologians did encourage greater individualism. Focusing on the affective experience of conversion, they developed forms of moral rigorism which represented, in both cases, an attempt to provide a reliable basis for Christian faith and practice in the fragmented intellectual context of post-reformation Europe.